The film ‘Dhurandhar 2’ has officially arrived in theatres, featuring the character Atif Ahmed, portrayed by actor Salim Siddiqui. This character is inspired by the real-life gangster-turned-politician Atiq Ahmed, who had a notorious reputation in Uttar Pradesh, India. Atiq Ahmed, born in 1962, had over 160 criminal cases against him during his lifetime, highlighting the extent of his criminal activities.

Atif Ahmed’s character arc in the film culminates in his assassination, mirroring the real-life assassination of Atiq Ahmed on April 15, 2023. Atiq was shot dead at point-blank range while in police custody, an event that shocked the nation and raised questions about the intersection of crime and politics in India. The film explores these themes, depicting the complex relationship between organized crime and political power.

Salim Siddiqui, at 51 years old, delivers a performance that critics have described as a “carbon copy” of Atiq Ahmed. His portrayal captures the essence of a character deeply entrenched in the criminal underworld, reflecting the real-life struggles and conflicts faced by individuals like Atiq. The film’s narrative is not solely focused on crime; it also includes references to significant geopolitical events, such as the 2008 Mumbai attacks, which serve to contextualize the story within a broader historical framework.

In ‘Dhurandhar 2’, the character Major Iqbal, inspired by Ilyas Kashmiri, a Pakistani militant leader, adds another layer of complexity to the narrative. This fictional element intertwines with real-life inspirations, creating a storyline that resonates with audiences familiar with the socio-political landscape of the region. The film runs for 3 hours and 49 minutes, providing ample time to delve into the intricacies of its characters and themes.

Quotes from the film, such as Major Iqbal’s assertion, “As long as Atif Ahmed is alive, he will handle everything,” reflect the power dynamics at play within the story. The film’s narrative often seems desperate to convince its viewers of the calculated nature of actions taken by the current regime, illustrating the blurred lines between governance and criminality.

As audiences engage with ‘Dhurandhar 2’, they are drawn into a world where dreams and realities collide. The film’s exploration of revenge, power, and the consequences of crime resonates with viewers, particularly in light of Atiq Ahmed’s controversial legacy. Critics have noted that while the film aims to depict a realistic portrayal of these themes, it ultimately serves as a form of entertainment, encapsulating the business of selling dreams.

As the film continues to screen in theatres, observers are keen to see how audiences respond to its portrayal of such a contentious figure and the implications it carries for the ongoing discourse around crime and politics in India. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the film’s impact on public perception of real-life events and figures, but its release has undoubtedly sparked conversations about the narratives we consume and their reflections on society.

The post Atif Ahmed in Dhurandhar: A Cinematic Reflection of Real-Life Events appeared first on newscri.

On March 19, 2026, a significant controversy emerged in Uttar Pradesh, Pakistan, surrounding the film ‘Dhurandhar 2’. The film has faced criticism for allegedly linking the notorious criminal Atiq Ahmed to the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan’s premier intelligence agency. S.T. Hasan, a prominent political figure, publicly condemned the film, asserting that the police are well aware of the connections between individuals depicted in the film and their actual affiliations. “Who they were connected to and who they were not, our police know this very well,” Hasan stated, highlighting the contentious nature of the film’s narrative.

Despite the film’s claims, intelligence agencies have not confirmed any links between Atiq Ahmed and the ISI. This lack of confirmation raises questions about the accuracy of the film’s portrayal and the motivations behind its production. The controversy has not only drawn attention to the film but also to the broader issues of political narratives and the portrayal of criminal figures in media.

In the backdrop of this controversy, Field Marshal Asim Munir, the head of the ISI, has issued a stark warning regarding potential shake-ups within the agency due to ongoing intelligence failures. He emphasized the need for the ISI to improve its performance, stating, “Perform or perish.” This statement underscores the pressure on the agency to address its shortcomings, particularly in light of the growing influence of groups like the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which is reported to operate a parallel government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP).

Reports indicate that the ISI and the military are currently not aligned on operational strategies, leading to further complications in addressing security threats. The TTP has been a significant concern for the ISI, which has faced criticism for its inability to provide actionable intelligence regarding the group’s activities. This situation has raised alarms about the effectiveness of Pakistan’s intelligence apparatus and its implications for national security.

In a related incident, two individuals, Azeem Rana and Azad Rajput, were arrested in Uttar Pradesh for allegedly sharing information with a gang based in Pakistan. This arrest highlights the ongoing challenges faced by law enforcement in combating cross-border criminal activities and the complexities of intelligence-sharing between nations.

As the situation continues to develop, the implications of the film ‘Dhurandhar 2’ and the criticisms directed at the ISI are likely to resonate within both political and security circles. The controversy serves as a reminder of the intricate relationship between media portrayals, public perception, and the operational realities of intelligence agencies.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the extent of the ISI’s involvement in the matters highlighted by the film, and the ongoing discussions surrounding these events will likely shape future narratives about the agency and its role in Pakistan’s security landscape.

The post Isi: Controversy Surrounding and ‘Dhurandhar 2’ in Pakistan appeared first on newscri.

What happens when a notorious gangster-turned-politician is killed in broad daylight? This question became a grim reality when Atiq Ahmed was shot dead on live television on April 15, 2023, in Prayagraj, India. The shocking incident unfolded as he was being escorted by police for a medical examination, raising serious concerns about the safety of high-profile detainees and the effectiveness of law enforcement in managing such individuals.

Atiq Ahmed’s assassination was executed by three men who posed as journalists, a tactic that highlights the audacity and planning behind the attack. The shooters, identified as Arun Maurya, Sunny Singh, and Lovelesh Tiwari, have since been taken to Pratapgarh jail for their safety due to threats against them. This incident marks a significant moment in a long history of crime and politics in India, where figures like Ahmed have blurred the lines between the two.

Born in 1962 in Prayagraj (then Allahabad), Atiq Ahmed had built a reputation that extended beyond mere criminal activity. With over 100 criminal cases against him, he was implicated in high-profile murders, including that of Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) MLA Raju Pal in 2005 and Umesh Pal in February 2023. His connections to terror networks and illegal financial channels further complicated his legacy, as he was linked to 200 bank accounts associated with his family and associates, and 50 shell companies used for money laundering.

Ahmed’s influence was not confined to the underworld; he had a significant impact on local politics, operating with a level of impunity that allowed him to maintain control even from behind bars. His last rites were held at a family graveyard in Prayagraj, a stark reminder of his deep roots in the community. Just two days before his death, his son, Asad Ahmed, was killed in a police encounter, adding another layer of tragedy to the family’s story.

Details surrounding the motivations for the attack on Ahmed remain unclear, but the implications are significant. The incident raises questions about the safety of individuals in custody and the ability of law enforcement to protect them from external threats. The public’s reaction has been mixed, with some expressing outrage over the brazen nature of the attack, while others see it as a form of vigilante justice.

As the investigation unfolds, the focus will likely shift to the broader implications of Ahmed’s death on crime and politics in India. Will this incident lead to increased scrutiny of the connections between crime and political power? Or will it further entrench the cycle of violence that has plagued many regions of the country? The answers to these questions remain to be seen.

In the aftermath of Ahmed’s assassination, the narrative surrounding crime and justice in India is poised for a significant shift. With the shooters now in custody and facing 14 days of judicial custody, the legal proceedings will undoubtedly attract considerable media attention. As the public grapples with the implications of this high-profile murder, the complexities of law enforcement, political influence, and organized crime continue to unfold.

Atiq Ahmed’s life and death serve as a stark reminder of the intertwined nature of crime and politics in India, raising critical questions about accountability and justice in a system that often appears to favor the powerful.

The post Atiq Ahmed: The Gangster-Turned-Politician Shot Dead on Live TV appeared first on newscri.