In a significant development, two individuals have been arrested and eight others booked for their involvement in circulating obscene videos allegedly featuring Ashok Kharat. The arrests were made in Ahilyanagar, Nashik, Maharashtra, on March 26, 2026, following a series of investigations into the matter.

The Maharashtra Police have taken swift action to halt the spread of these videos, which reportedly depict sexual atrocities committed by Kharat. A Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been established to probe the cases against him, with six criminal cases registered so far.

Authorities have identified around 100 objectionable videos related to Ashok Kharat, raising serious concerns about the nature of the content. Among the victims is a pregnant woman, highlighting the gravity of the situation.

On March 17, 2026, Ashok Kharat was arrested, and the investigation was formally handed over to the SIT two days later. The police have also registered two FIRs against three individuals under the Information Technology Act, including Rahul Shinde, who allegedly circulated an obscene video in a WhatsApp group.

Yogesh Adhav is reported to have forwarded the video to Shinde after receiving it from Sandip Garje. The police have issued warnings against sharing any obscene material that could potentially reveal the identities of the victims, their families, or residences.

SIT officials emphasized the sensitivity of the case, urging the public to refrain from disseminating such material. “The case is sensitive and serious. People must refrain from sharing any obscene material that could reveal the identity of victims, their families or residences,” they stated.

In a related statement, the Maharashtra Police reiterated their stance, issuing a clear warning against sharing any identifying details of the women involved. Authorities have assured the public that strict legal action will be taken against anyone found engaging in such activities.

As the investigation unfolds, the police have urged individuals to delete any stored content related to the case. The community remains on alert as the SIT continues its work, aiming to bring justice to the victims.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the total number of videos and the extent of the investigation, but the authorities are committed to addressing the issue comprehensively.

The case has drawn significant attention, reflecting broader societal concerns regarding the circulation of obscene material and the protection of victims’ rights.

The post Ashok Kharat Videos All: Arrests Made in Obscene Video Case appeared first on newscri.

The Delhi High Court ruled on March 1, 2026, that the act of a higher court setting aside an order does not inherently reflect on the competence of the judge who issued the original ruling. This statement was made by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma while addressing an application from a judicial officer.

The application sought to delete remarks made against police officials in a previous judgment. Justice Sharma emphasized that the decision to expunge these remarks was based on legal reasoning rather than a commentary on the officers’ abilities. “The fact that an order passed by a court, whether Trial Court or even High Court, is stayed, modified, or otherwise interfered with by a higher court… cannot, by itself, be regarded as a reflection on the competence or ability of the judge who passed the order,” she stated.

Furthermore, the High Court found that delays in providing forensic reports were due to the laboratory’s inefficiencies, not the police officials involved. This clarification came in light of a trial court’s concerns regarding delays in proceedings attributed to accused individuals being in judicial custody.

Despite the application, the High Court declined to recall or delete portions of its earlier judgment concerning the remarks about the judicial officer. Justice Sharma has been primarily engaged with criminal cases since her elevation to the Delhi High Court in 2022, and she was assigned to handle cases involving Members of Parliament and Legislative Assemblies in September 2023.

In a related matter, the Delhi High Court has granted time to Arvind Kejriwal and others to respond to a plea from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding the excise policy case. This follows a trial court’s decision on February 27, 2026, which discharged Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and 21 others, criticizing the CBI’s investigation as “perverse” and lacking credible evidence.

The trial court remarked, “The agency’s case could not stand judicial scrutiny and had lost credibility,” highlighting concerns over the validity of the evidence presented. It further noted, “Forcing the accused to face a full criminal trial without legally valid material would not serve the ends of justice.”

Justice Sharma’s tenure has seen her navigate complex criminal cases, and her recent rulings continue to draw attention within the legal community. Observers are keen to see how the ongoing cases will unfold, particularly in light of the High Court’s recent clarifications.

The post Delhi High Court Ruling Clarifies Judicial Competence appeared first on newscri.