The central question surrounding child trafficking in Delhi is: How severe is the situation, and what actions are being taken to combat it? The recent notice issued by the Delhi High Court regarding child trafficking incidents from railway stations and trains provides a stark answer: the situation is alarming and requires immediate attention.

The court has characterized Delhi as a “mandi” for child trafficking, indicating that the city has become a hub for such illicit activities. Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya emphasized the severity of the issue, stating, “Just roam around the railway stations for two hours, and you can gather what is going on there.” This statement underscores the visible nature of the problem.

Despite various orders previously passed by the court, the menace of child trafficking remains unabated. The court has repeatedly expressed concerns and directed authorities to take effective measures to address the issue. The petition prompting this notice was filed by the Just Rights for Children Alliance, represented by Advocate Prabhsahay Kaur.

In response to the growing crisis, the court has requested the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) to provide necessary data and suggestions on child trafficking. This indicates a collaborative effort to tackle the issue, involving multiple stakeholders.

Furthermore, the Union Railways Ministry has notified a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) aimed at curbing the surge in child trafficking incidents. This step reflects an acknowledgment of the problem and a commitment to finding solutions.

In a related development, the Delhi Police Special Cell recently arrested a wanted terrorist in the Ghazipur area of Delhi, who was linked to a recently busted module. The arrest highlights the broader security challenges in the region, with foreign currencies from Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan recovered from the accused, along with a Nepalese SIM card.

The court’s remarks and the actions taken by various entities signal a critical juncture in the fight against child trafficking in Delhi. However, the persistent nature of the problem raises questions about the effectiveness of current measures.

As the situation continues to unfold, the focus remains on how authorities will implement the requested changes and whether these efforts will lead to a significant reduction in child trafficking incidents. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the specific outcomes of the court’s notice and the subsequent actions by the involved parties.

The post Delhi: Child Trafficking in : Court Issues Notice appeared first on newscri.

Rajpal Yadav recently addressed a controversy involving Akshay Kumar during the promotions for their upcoming film Bhooth Bangla. The incident gained traction after a viral video showed Akshay Kumar asking Yadav to move aside during a group photo, which sparked discussions among fans and media.

In response to the uproar, Rajpal Yadav clarified that the gesture was a respectful adjustment for the photo. He explained, “If I talk about the controversy of that day, both Akshay and Ekta had come along with the other two girls. I was late, and they were waiting for me.” This explanation aimed to dispel any misunderstandings regarding the interaction.

Yadav further elaborated that Akshay Kumar prefers to arrange group photos with females positioned in the middle, emphasizing the actor’s deep-rooted moral values. “This is actually the deep-rooted moral values of Akshay Paji… I don’t know what people thought from a distance,” he stated.

The film Bhooth Bangla is set to release on April 10, 2026, and both actors have a long professional history, having collaborated on multiple projects in the past. Despite the controversy, Yadav expressed admiration for Kumar, saying, “In life, he loves me, I love him, and I get inspired by him somewhere.”

Currently, Rajpal Yadav is out on interim bail in a Rs 9 crore cheque bounce case, with the Delhi High Court extending his bail until April 1, 2026. Yadav has opted to contest this case in court rather than settling it out of court.

As the promotional activities for Bhooth Bangla continue, the incident has drawn mixed reactions from fans and industry insiders alike. While some have expressed concern over the viral video, others have come to Yadav’s defense, highlighting the importance of context in such situations.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full impact of this controversy on the film’s promotion strategy. However, both actors appear committed to moving forward with their professional endeavors.

The post Rajpal Yadav Addresses Controversy with Akshay Kumar appeared first on newscri.

The ruling, delivered on March 17, 2026, by Justice Mini Pushkarna, mandated social media platforms to remove the allegedly defamatory content. The court clarified that this order applies strictly within Indian jurisdiction, emphasizing the need for responsible content management on these platforms.

Himayani Puri, who is the daughter of Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri, filed a substantial defamation suit amounting to Rs. 10 crore against various defendants, including journalists and social media platforms. The court found a prima facie case in favor of Puri, indicating that the allegations against her warranted serious legal consideration.

The defamatory posts reportedly began circulating on February 22, 2026, and Puri’s legal team argued that a coordinated online campaign was orchestrated against her, possibly due to her familial connections. “I am a victim of an attack because I am the daughter of a cabinet minister. I suspect political malice,” remarked Himayani Puri’s counsel during the proceedings.

In addition to ordering the removal of content uploaded from Indian IP addresses, the court also directed that URLs and links uploaded from outside India must be blocked from being viewed within the country. However, the issue of whether courts can order a global takedown of online content remains unresolved, as Justice Pushkarna noted, “The question of whether courts can order global takedown of online content is already pending before another Bench.”

Arvind Datar, representing Meta, acknowledged the limitations of the court’s jurisdiction, stating, “We can take down only within India. On global, we have taken a stand that we cannot do it globally and we are contesting the issue.” This highlights the ongoing challenges in regulating online content across borders, particularly in cases involving high-profile individuals.

The court has issued summons to the defendants in the suit, and as the case progresses, it may set important precedents regarding online defamation and the responsibilities of social media platforms. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, observers are keenly watching how this case will unfold and its implications for similar cases in the future.

The post Hardeep Puri’s Daughter Wins Defamation Case Against Online Allegations appeared first on newscri.

Before recent developments, Celina Jaitley had been actively seeking legal representation for her brother, Vikrant Jaitly, who has been detained in the United Arab Emirates since September 6, 2024. The expectation was that the Delhi High Court would support her petition, allowing her to communicate with him and ensure his legal rights were upheld.

However, the situation took a decisive turn when the Delhi High Court closed Celina Jaitley’s petition. The court noted that Vikrant Jaitly had expressed a desire not to seek legal assistance at this stage, leading to the dismissal of her request for a video conference call with him. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav remarked, “There is no reason to keep the writ petition pending. It is accordingly disposed of.” This marked a significant shift in the legal proceedings surrounding Vikrant Jaitly’s case.

The immediate effects of this decision have been profound for both Celina Jaitley and her brother. While the Indian Embassy in Abu Dhabi has met with Vikrant Jaitly nine times since his arrest, he has refused to communicate with Celina. His current stance on legal representation is contingent upon decisions made by his wife, further complicating the situation.

Experts have pointed out that the court’s ruling reflects a broader context of legal autonomy, emphasizing that when an individual, like Vikrant Jaitly, chooses to forgo legal assistance, the courts may respect that choice. Justice Kaurav’s statement, “When Mr. Jaitly says something, we have to adhere to it,” underscores the judiciary’s position on personal agency in legal matters.

Despite the court’s dismissal of Celina Jaitley’s petition, the Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of External Affairs to continue providing support for Vikrant Jaitly’s legal needs. This suggests that while the petition was closed, the government will still play a role in ensuring his rights are protected during his detention.

Celina Jaitly’s counsel expressed concerns for her brother’s safety, particularly in light of the ongoing conflict in the region, stating, “We are concerned for his safety, especially in view of the war.” This highlights the precarious nature of Vikrant Jaitly’s situation and the potential risks involved.

As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how Vikrant Jaitly’s decisions regarding legal representation will unfold and what implications they may have for his future. Details remain unconfirmed regarding further actions that may be taken by Celina Jaitley or the Indian authorities.

The post Celina Jaitley appeared first on newscri.

The Legends League Cricket 2026 is set to take place at the Captain Roop Singh Stadium in Gwalior, with the tournament already witnessing some competitive matches. As of now, the Mumbai Spartans hold the 4th position on the points table with 1 win and 1 loss, while the Konark Suryas Odisha are positioned 5th, also with 1 win and 1 loss.

Bharat Chipli has emerged as the top run scorer for the Mumbai Spartans, accumulating 89 runs, while Amit Verma leads the bowling attack with 5 wickets. In their most recent match, the Spartans secured a victory against the India Tigers by 17 runs.

On the other hand, the Konark Suryas Odisha’s top performer is Morne Van Wyk, who has scored 78 runs. Saurin Thakar has been pivotal in their bowling lineup, taking 4 wickets. However, the Suryas faced a setback in their last match, losing to the Royal Riders Punjab by 43 runs.

Complicating matters for the tournament, JioStar has obtained an interim order from the Delhi High Court against Absolute Legends Sports. This legal order was issued on March 11, 2026, coinciding with the league’s scheduled kickoff.

The dispute has been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of the Delhi High Court, indicating ongoing legal challenges that could impact the tournament’s operations.

As the tournament progresses, observers are keenly watching how these legal issues will unfold and affect the teams and matches. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full implications of the court’s decision on the league’s future.

The post Legends League Cricket 2026 appeared first on newscri.

The Delhi High Court ruled that setting aside an order by a higher court does not reflect on the competence of the judge who passed the order. This observation was made by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma while addressing an application from a judicial officer seeking the deletion of remarks made against police officials in a previous judgment.

Justice Sharma emphasized that the expunging of remarks was based on legal reasoning rather than a comment on the officers’ abilities. “The fact that an order passed by a court, whether Trial Court or even High Court, is stayed, modified, or otherwise interfered with by a higher court… cannot, by itself, be regarded as a reflection on the competence or ability of the judge who passed the order,” she stated.

In her ruling, the High Court found that delays in providing forensic reports were attributable to the laboratory, not the police officials involved. This clarification comes in light of concerns raised by the trial court regarding delays in proceedings due to accused persons being in judicial custody.

Despite the application from the judicial officer, the High Court declined to recall or delete portions of its earlier judgment regarding the remarks made. Justice Sharma has been primarily dealing with criminal cases since her elevation to the Delhi High Court in 2022, and she was assigned to handle cases against Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) in September 2023.

In a related matter, the Delhi High Court granted time to Arvind Kejriwal and others to respond to a plea from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) concerning the excise policy case. The trial court had previously discharged Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and 21 others on February 27, 2026, criticizing the CBI’s investigation as “perverse” and lacking credible evidence.

Justice Sharma remarked, “I have not received any stay yet.. till the court gets an order staying the proceedings, the case has to proceed.” This statement underscores the ongoing nature of the legal proceedings surrounding the excise policy case.

The trial court’s findings have raised questions about the credibility of the CBI’s case, with the court stating, “The agency’s case could not stand judicial scrutiny and had lost credibility.” Furthermore, it noted that forcing the accused to face a full criminal trial without legally valid material would not serve the ends of justice.

The Delhi High Court’s role in reviewing lower court decisions is a standard part of the judicial process in India, and observers are keenly watching how these developments will unfold in the coming weeks.

The post Delhi High Court Ruling Clarifies Judicial Competence appeared first on newscri.

Legends League Cricket has not been around for long, making it a very new endeavor in the cricket world. Launched in 2022, the league aims to bring back legendary and retired cricketers to the field, offering fans a chance to witness their favorite players in action once again. The current season is set to run from March 11, 2026, to March 27, 2026, featuring teams such as India Captains, Royal Riders Punjab, Konark Suryas Odisha, India Tigers, Southern Super Stars, and Mumbai Spartans.

However, the tournament’s opening day has been overshadowed by a legal dispute. On March 11, 2026, JioStar secured an interim order from the Delhi High Court against Absolute Legends Sports Private Limited, the organizing body of the league. This unexpected development has raised concerns about the tournament’s future and its ongoing operations.

The dispute has been directed to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, indicating that both parties may seek an amicable resolution. The next court date is scheduled for March 17, 2026, which will be crucial in determining the path forward for the league amidst this legal challenge.

Despite the legal issues, the tournament kicked off with a match on the same day, where the Southern Super Stars faced off against the India Captains. Southern Super Stars emerged victorious, marking a promising start to their campaign with a record of 1-0 and 2 points. The points table currently shows Southern Super Stars, Royal Riders Punjab, India Tigers, and Mumbai Spartans each with 2 points, reflecting a competitive atmosphere as the season progresses.

The playoff round is anticipated to be exciting, with the top-ranked team set to face the second-ranked team in the first match. The winner of this playoff match will advance to the finals, adding an extra layer of intensity to the ongoing competition. Fans are eager to see how the teams will perform in the coming matches, especially with the backdrop of the legal proceedings.

As the situation unfolds, observers are closely watching the developments in the court and how they may impact the league’s operations. The involvement of the Delhi High Court suggests that the matter is being taken seriously, and the outcome could have significant implications for the future of Legends League Cricket.

In summary, while the 2026 season of Legends League Cricket has begun with excitement on the field, the legal challenges facing the tournament cannot be overlooked. The next few days will be critical in determining the league’s trajectory as it navigates this unexpected hurdle.

The post Legends League Cricket Faces Legal Challenge as 2026 Season Begins appeared first on newscri.

The Delhi High Court ruled on March 1, 2026, that the act of a higher court setting aside an order does not inherently reflect on the competence of the judge who issued the original ruling. This statement was made by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma while addressing an application from a judicial officer.

The application sought to delete remarks made against police officials in a previous judgment. Justice Sharma emphasized that the decision to expunge these remarks was based on legal reasoning rather than a commentary on the officers’ abilities. “The fact that an order passed by a court, whether Trial Court or even High Court, is stayed, modified, or otherwise interfered with by a higher court… cannot, by itself, be regarded as a reflection on the competence or ability of the judge who passed the order,” she stated.

Furthermore, the High Court found that delays in providing forensic reports were due to the laboratory’s inefficiencies, not the police officials involved. This clarification came in light of a trial court’s concerns regarding delays in proceedings attributed to accused individuals being in judicial custody.

Despite the application, the High Court declined to recall or delete portions of its earlier judgment concerning the remarks about the judicial officer. Justice Sharma has been primarily engaged with criminal cases since her elevation to the Delhi High Court in 2022, and she was assigned to handle cases involving Members of Parliament and Legislative Assemblies in September 2023.

In a related matter, the Delhi High Court has granted time to Arvind Kejriwal and others to respond to a plea from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding the excise policy case. This follows a trial court’s decision on February 27, 2026, which discharged Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and 21 others, criticizing the CBI’s investigation as “perverse” and lacking credible evidence.

The trial court remarked, “The agency’s case could not stand judicial scrutiny and had lost credibility,” highlighting concerns over the validity of the evidence presented. It further noted, “Forcing the accused to face a full criminal trial without legally valid material would not serve the ends of justice.”

Justice Sharma’s tenure has seen her navigate complex criminal cases, and her recent rulings continue to draw attention within the legal community. Observers are keen to see how the ongoing cases will unfold, particularly in light of the High Court’s recent clarifications.

The post Delhi High Court Ruling Clarifies Judicial Competence appeared first on newscri.

The Legends League Cricket 2026 is currently in progress, with both the Mumbai Spartans and Konark Suryas Odisha holding a record of one win and one loss each. The tournament, which began on March 11, 2026, is facing challenges due to legal disputes.

As of now, the Mumbai Spartans are positioned fourth on the points table, having secured one victory against the India Tigers by 17 runs. Their top run scorer, Bharat Chipli, has accumulated 89 runs, while Amit Verma leads the bowling department with five wickets.

In contrast, the Konark Suryas Odisha are in fifth place, having lost their most recent match against Royal Riders Punjab by 43 runs. Morne Van Wyk is their leading run scorer with 78 runs, and Saurin Thakar has taken four wickets, showcasing his bowling prowess.

Amidst the competition, JioStar has obtained an interim order from the Delhi High Court against Absolute Legends Sports, which has added a layer of complexity to the league. This order was issued on the same day the tournament was set to commence.

The ongoing dispute has been referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of the Delhi High Court, indicating that the legal challenges could impact the tournament’s operations and financial transparency.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the potential outcomes of this legal situation, but observers are keenly watching how it may affect the remaining matches and the overall integrity of the Legends League Cricket.

As the tournament unfolds, the performances of teams like the Mumbai Spartans and Konark Suryas Odisha will be crucial in determining their standings and prospects for the season.

With the league still in its early stages, fans are eager to see how the teams navigate both the competitive landscape and the legal hurdles that have emerged.

The Legends League Cricket 2026 promises to be an exciting season, blending thrilling cricket action with the complexities of legal proceedings.

The post Legends League Cricket 2026: Mumbai Spartans and Konark Suryas Odisha Compete appeared first on newscri.

The National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) has been actively managing the processing of GST refunds for candidates who participated in various medical examinations. Recently, the board issued a notice highlighting the non-processing of GST refunds due to missing bank details from candidates. This situation has prompted NBEMS to remind candidates of the importance of submitting accurate bank information to facilitate the refund process.

Current Developments

As of March 12, 2026, the NBEMS has reported that 478 candidates have yet to submit their bank details necessary for processing GST refunds. The board has set a deadline of April 15, 2026, for candidates to provide this information, stating, “Failure to submit the bank details latest by 15/04/2026, shall result in non-processing of the refund of GST amount.” This notice serves as a critical reminder for those affected to act promptly to ensure they receive their refunds.

Judicial Intervention

In a related development, the Delhi High Court has ordered NBEMS to reserve one DNB seat for a NEET-PG candidate. This ruling comes in the context of a legal challenge involving a candidate who had an All India Rank of 33,017 in the NEET-PG 2025 examination. Justice Jasmeet Singh noted that the petitioner was not pursuing a PG course and had already relinquished her allotted seat during the stray round of admissions. This case highlights the complexities surrounding seat reservations and the legal recourse available to candidates.

Impact on Candidates

The implications of these developments are significant for candidates navigating the medical examination landscape in India. With the GPAT 2026 exam conducted on March 7, 2026, candidates are now awaiting the provisional answer key, which is expected to be released later this month. The final results for GPAT 2026 are anticipated by April 7, 2026, further adding to the urgency for candidates to stay informed about their standings and any potential refunds.

Future Expectations

As the April 15 deadline approaches for GST refund submissions, candidates are urged to ensure their bank details are submitted correctly to avoid complications. Observers expect that the NBEMS will continue to monitor the situation closely, particularly in light of the recent court ruling regarding DNB seat reservations. The board’s actions in response to these developments will likely shape the experiences of candidates in the upcoming admissions cycle.

In summary, the ongoing situation regarding GST refunds and DNB seat reservations reflects the challenges faced by candidates in the medical examination process. As NBEMS navigates these issues, candidates are encouraged to remain proactive in managing their applications and understanding their rights within the system. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining how these matters unfold and what further actions may be required from both candidates and the NBEMS.

The post NBEMS Issues Notice on GST Refunds and DNB Seat Reservation appeared first on newscri.