The controversy centres around a series of tweets posted by Ayyub between 2013 and 2017, which have been described as derogatory, inflammatory, and communally sensitive. The tweets allegedly insult Hindu deities and prominent historical figure Vinayak Damodar Savarkar.

In response to these tweets, the Union government has stated that X Corp, the parent company of the platform where the tweets were posted, may lose its safe harbour protection in India. This protection is crucial for intermediaries, as it shields them from liability for user-generated content, provided they comply with due diligence requirements.

The government has filed an affidavit asserting that X’s inaction in removing the tweets constitutes non-compliance with these requirements. Furthermore, the Delhi Police have issued judicial orders and statutory notices to X Corp regarding the tweets.

According to the Union government, “The police notices and trial court order constitute ‘actual knowledge’ under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, triggering a statutory obligation on X to act expeditiously and remove such unlawful content.”

Section 79 of the IT Act provides safe harbour protection to intermediaries if they follow due diligence and remove unlawful content upon notification. However, the government claims that X Corp’s failure to act on the police’s requests could lead to significant legal repercussions.

The Delhi High Court has been informed that the police have requested action under Section 69A of the IT Act to block the tweets, further complicating the situation for X Corp.

As the situation develops, it remains to be seen how X Corp will respond to the government’s demands and whether Rana Ayyub will face any further legal challenges regarding her tweets.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the exact nature of the government’s next steps in this ongoing controversy.

The post Rana Ayyub’s Tweets Spark Controversy in India appeared first on newscri.

The song “Sarke Chunariya” has recently been banned due to its vulgar lyrics, igniting a significant controversy in the Indian music industry. The ban was confirmed on March 18, 2026, by Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw during a session in the Lok Sabha.

The immediate circumstances surrounding the ban arose after a complaint was lodged with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), leading to the removal of the Hindi version of the song. Raqueeb Alam, the lyricist, stated that he merely translated the original Kannada lyrics written by the film’s director, Prem.

Critics have pointed out that the lyrics objectify women and contain double meanings, which has drawn widespread outrage. Both the Haryana and Karnataka women’s commissions have described the lyrics as objectionable, further fueling calls for the song’s removal.

Raqueeb Alam expressed his feelings of humiliation regarding the controversy, emphasizing that he did not write the lyrics himself. He stated, “Yeh lyrics maine nahi likhe hain, they were written by the film’s director Prem in Kannada.” He also offered an apology, saying, “Even so, if the words of this song have hurt the sentiments of anyone, I sincerely apologise for it.”

In light of the ban, Minister Vaishnaw remarked, “A ban has been imposed on the song. We must operate according to the reasonable restrictions under the Freedom of Speech.” This statement highlights the delicate balance between artistic expression and societal values.

The controversy surrounding “Sarke Chunariya” began soon after its release, leading to a swift backlash from various sectors of society. The song’s reception has raised questions about the portrayal of women in music and the responsibilities of artists in their creative expressions.

Raqueeb Alam further reflected on the implications of the lyrics, stating, “I have children, too, what if they see such a song of mine or if someone asks them ‘what kind of songs your father writes’.” His comments underscore the personal impact of the controversy on artists and their families.

As the situation unfolds, reactions from the public and industry stakeholders continue to emerge, with many calling for a reassessment of lyrical content in mainstream media. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any further actions that may be taken by the CBFC or other governing bodies.

The ban on “Sarke Chunariya” serves as a reminder of the ongoing discussions about artistic freedom and the societal responsibilities that accompany it, particularly in a diverse and culturally rich nation like India.

The post Sarke Chunariya Lyrics Controversy appeared first on newscri.

The Supreme Court of India has declined to entertain a plea filed by journalist Ravi Nair, which challenged a notice issued by the Ahmedabad Crime Branch. This decision marks a significant development in Nair’s ongoing legal troubles, particularly in relation to a complaint made by Adani Ports and SEZ Ltd concerning an article co-authored by him.

Nair was summoned to appear before the Crime Branch for a preliminary enquiry on February 19, 2026, as part of the investigation into the complaint. This notice follows Nair’s previous conviction in a criminal defamation case filed by Adani Enterprises Ltd, where he was sentenced to one year’s imprisonment and fined Rs 5,000.

The court found Nair guilty under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code for tweets and articles published between October 2020 and July 2021. The ruling emphasized that the imputations in his writings were framed in a manner that conveyed assertions of fact rather than speculative opinion, according to the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mansa.

In addition to his legal battles, Nair’s situation unfolds against the backdrop of the Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026, which aims to prevent fraudulent or coercive religious conversions. The bill mandates that individuals planning a religious conversion must provide authorities with a 60-day advance notice.

Unlawful conversion under the proposed law would be classified as a cognizable, non-bailable offence, punishable with imprisonment of up to seven years. This legislative move has sparked discussions about the implications for personal freedoms and religious practices in the region.

As Nair navigates these legal challenges, the outcomes remain uncertain. The implications of the Supreme Court’s decision and the ongoing investigations by the Ahmedabad Crime Branch could have lasting effects on his career and the broader landscape of journalism in India. Details remain unconfirmed.

The post Ravi Nair Faces Legal Challenges Following Supreme Court Ruling appeared first on newscri.