The central question surrounding child trafficking in Delhi is: How severe is the situation, and what actions are being taken to combat it? The recent notice issued by the Delhi High Court regarding child trafficking incidents from railway stations and trains provides a stark answer: the situation is alarming and requires immediate attention.

The court has characterized Delhi as a “mandi” for child trafficking, indicating that the city has become a hub for such illicit activities. Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya emphasized the severity of the issue, stating, “Just roam around the railway stations for two hours, and you can gather what is going on there.” This statement underscores the visible nature of the problem.

Despite various orders previously passed by the court, the menace of child trafficking remains unabated. The court has repeatedly expressed concerns and directed authorities to take effective measures to address the issue. The petition prompting this notice was filed by the Just Rights for Children Alliance, represented by Advocate Prabhsahay Kaur.

In response to the growing crisis, the court has requested the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) to provide necessary data and suggestions on child trafficking. This indicates a collaborative effort to tackle the issue, involving multiple stakeholders.

Furthermore, the Union Railways Ministry has notified a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) aimed at curbing the surge in child trafficking incidents. This step reflects an acknowledgment of the problem and a commitment to finding solutions.

In a related development, the Delhi Police Special Cell recently arrested a wanted terrorist in the Ghazipur area of Delhi, who was linked to a recently busted module. The arrest highlights the broader security challenges in the region, with foreign currencies from Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan recovered from the accused, along with a Nepalese SIM card.

The court’s remarks and the actions taken by various entities signal a critical juncture in the fight against child trafficking in Delhi. However, the persistent nature of the problem raises questions about the effectiveness of current measures.

As the situation continues to unfold, the focus remains on how authorities will implement the requested changes and whether these efforts will lead to a significant reduction in child trafficking incidents. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the specific outcomes of the court’s notice and the subsequent actions by the involved parties.

The post Delhi: Child Trafficking in : Court Issues Notice appeared first on newscri.

The No Kings protests raise a critical question: What is driving the widespread mobilization against former President Donald Trump’s administration? The answer lies in a collective response to perceived authoritarian governance and aggressive policies, with more than 3,200 events planned across all 50 states for March 28, 2026.

The No Kings movement was launched on June 14, 2025, coinciding with Trump’s birthday, and has since gained significant momentum. The inaugural event attracted an estimated 4 million to 6 million participants across roughly 2,100 sites nationwide, while the second event in October 2025 saw participation swell to approximately 7 million in over 2,700 cities.

These protests have been fueled by opposition to Trump’s immigration policies, the ongoing war in Iran, and the rollback of transgender rights. Demonstrations are not limited to the United States; protests have also been organized in more than a dozen other countries, highlighting the global resonance of the movement.

In Rome, thousands took to the streets to protest against Israeli and U.S. attacks on Iran, while in Paris, American expatriates joined forces with labor unions and human rights organizations to voice their dissent. The movement has garnered support from various groups, including Indivisible, which aims to mobilize grassroots activism against perceived injustices.

Actor Robert De Niro has been vocal about the need for resistance, stating, “It’s that simple, and we have to stand up to him, to the regime, fight it with everything. We just got to fight, you know, peacefully, but we have to resist. We have to. We have no choice.” This sentiment reflects the urgency felt by many participants as they prepare for the upcoming protests.

The No Kings protests signify a pivotal moment in U.S. political activism, with organizers and participants alike expressing their commitment to challenging the status quo. As the date approaches, the extent of participation and the impact of these demonstrations remain to be seen.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the specific locations and times of the planned events, but the scale of mobilization suggests a significant outpouring of public sentiment against the current administration’s policies.

The post No Kings Protest: Nationwide Demonstrations Planned appeared first on newscri.

The European Parliament has traditionally acted as a brake on hardline instincts of EU governments on migration. However, a recent vote has marked a significant shift in this approach.

On March 27, 2026, the European Parliament voted on new EU return policies in the field of migration. The vote was adopted with 389 votes in favor, 206 against, and 32 abstentions. This decisive moment has led to the approval of a law that allows for the detention of individuals without the right to stay in the EU for up to two years, an increase from the current maximum detention period of 18 months.

The new proposals also include the establishment of ‘return hubs’ outside the EU for deported individuals, a move that has been spearheaded by Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Greece, and Denmark. These changes have raised concerns among human rights advocates.

The International Rescue Committee described the vote as a historic setback for refugee rights, highlighting the potential for asylum seekers to disappear into ‘legal black holes’ beyond EU borders. Critics argue that the proposals, influenced by an alliance of mostly centre-right and far-right lawmakers, will strip individuals of rights and protections based solely on their migration status.

Charlie Weimers, a member of the European Parliament, stated, “The era of deportations has begun.” This sentiment reflects a growing concern among various stakeholders about the implications of the new policies.

Marta Welander, an advocate for refugee rights, warned that the legislation is designed to deter, detain, and deport people seeking safety. She emphasized that the return hubs will be located outside of EU territory, where policymakers cannot guarantee that people’s rights will be upheld.

Additionally, the draft law features 38 formulations proposed by the far-right ESN group, further illustrating the influence of far-right politics in shaping EU migration policy.

Human rights groups have also expressed alarm over the harsh penalties included in the proposals for those who refuse to be relocated to the return hubs.

The next step will involve negotiations between lawmakers and member states on a final legislative text, as the EU grapples with the implications of these new return policies.

The post Eu-parlament: European Parliament Votes on New Return Policies appeared first on newscri.

The recent criticisms from Aneet Padda and her sister Reet Padda have sparked discussions about the portrayal of political narratives in Indian cinema. The central question raised by their comments is whether films like Dhurandhar, The Kashmir Files, and The Kerala Story serve as vehicles for propaganda rather than genuine storytelling. Reet Padda has been particularly vocal, labeling Dhurandhar as propaganda and criticizing Priyanka Chopra for her silence during a significant moment at the Oscars.

Reet Padda’s remarks highlight her concerns regarding the use of exaggerated statistics in films. She pointed out that while The Kashmir Files and The Kerala Story claimed that 32,000 women converted to Islam, the actual number of such cases is only 100. This stark contrast raises questions about the integrity of the narratives presented in these films.

In her criticism, Reet Padda also addressed the broader implications of films that align with government agendas. She stated that films contrary to the government’s narrative often struggle to secure releases, suggesting a systemic bias in the film industry. This observation aligns with her advocacy for human rights, as she works as a marketing professional in Paris and is committed to speaking out against political figures who exploit religion for political gain.

Reet Padda’s comments extend beyond the realm of cinema. She expressed disappointment in Priyanka Chopra’s lack of support for political causes, particularly when a co-host at the Oscars spoke in favor of Palestine. “She has an opportunity to denounce an unlawful war alongside someone taking a stand, and…she can’t even applaud,” Reet stated, emphasizing the responsibility public figures have in addressing critical social issues.

Aneet Padda, who gained fame with the film Saiyaara released in 2025, has not publicly commented on her sister’s statements. However, the attention surrounding their family has increased as they navigate the complexities of fame and activism in the film industry.

Reet Padda’s criticisms reflect a growing sentiment among some filmmakers and audiences who are increasingly aware of the political implications of cinema. The discussion around these films raises essential questions about the role of artists in society and their responsibility to engage with pressing social issues.

As the conversation continues, it remains to be seen how the film industry will respond to these criticisms and whether there will be a shift in how political narratives are portrayed on screen. The impact of these discussions may influence future projects and the opportunities available for filmmakers who challenge the status quo.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential repercussions for the Padda sisters following their outspoken views. The evolving landscape of Indian cinema and its intersection with politics will likely remain a topic of debate in the coming months.

The post Aneet Padda and Reet Padda Criticize Films and Priyanka Chopra appeared first on newscri.

The Sathankulam case, which has garnered national attention, revolves around the custodial deaths of Jayaraj and Bennix in June 2020. Before the recent judgement, there was a widespread expectation that the case would bring to light the systemic issues of police brutality and accountability in India. The incident occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, leading to public outrage and protests against the Sathankulam police’s actions.

On March 23, 2026, the First Additional District and Sessions Court in Madurai delivered a decisive verdict, finding all nine police officers involved in the case guilty. This marked a significant shift from the initial perception that the officers might evade justice. The court concluded that the deaths of Jayaraj and Bennix were the result of murder, rejecting the defense’s argument that the injuries were self-inflicted.

The immediate aftermath of the judgement has profound implications for the parties involved. The sentencing for the guilty officers is scheduled for March 30, 2026, which will determine the extent of their punishment. This case has not only affected the families of the victims but has also raised questions about the integrity of law enforcement in India.

Judge G Muthukumaran emphasized the unnatural nature of the injuries inflicted on Jayaraj and Bennix, stating, “The injuries inflicted on Jayaraj and Bennix were unnatural, which ultimately caused their death.” This statement underscores the court’s stance on the severity of the police’s actions.

The case’s journey has been lengthy, lasting nearly six years and involving the examination of over 100 witnesses. Initially, the Madurai bench of the Madras High Court took suo motu cognizance of the matter, leading to a judicial inquiry and the eventual transfer of the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) at the request of the Director General of Police.

As the trial progressed, charges were framed against the officers for multiple offences under the Indian Penal Code, including murder. The CBI’s involvement added a layer of scrutiny and highlighted the importance of accountability in cases of custodial violence.

The Sathankulam case has become emblematic of the broader issues of police misconduct and the need for reform in law enforcement practices across India. It has sparked discussions about the necessity of protecting human rights and ensuring that justice is served in cases of police brutality.

In the words of the High Court, “Justice delayed is justice denied and justice hurried is justice buried,” reflecting the critical balance that must be maintained in the pursuit of justice. The outcome of this case will likely influence future legal proceedings related to custodial violence and police accountability.

As the sentencing date approaches, the nation watches closely, awaiting the final resolution of a case that has highlighted the urgent need for reform in the Indian police system.

The post Sathankulam Case Judgement appeared first on newscri.

“Families of the forcibly disappeared are being displaced, their homes being destroyed, and their assets seized and controlled by the military,” a human rights activist stated, shedding light on the dire situation in Balochistan, Pakistan.

Recent reports indicate that eight individuals have gone missing amid allegations against Pakistani security forces, raising alarm among local communities and human rights organizations. Families of these missing persons have not been presented before any court, further deepening concerns about the rule of law in the region.

The ongoing conflict and instability in Iran have led to significant changes in the smuggling of Iranian fuel, which has historically supported livelihoods in Balochistan. In 2024, nearly 10 million liters of Iranian gasoline and diesel were smuggled into Pakistan daily via various land and sea routes.

However, the war in Iran has restricted several border crossings, complicating the already precarious situation for those dependent on this illicit trade. As the smuggling operations face increased scrutiny, the local economy is under threat.

Human rights violations in Balochistan are escalating at an alarming pace. Political and human rights activists are reportedly being silenced in brutal and inhumane ways. Mahrang Baloch, a prominent human rights activist, is currently imprisoned on what many believe to be fabricated charges.

“These tactics are designed solely to silence those who raise their voices for their loved ones,” the activist added, highlighting the systematic oppression faced by families seeking justice.

The situation in Balochistan remains tense, with reports of increasing violence and repression against those who dare to speak out. The local population continues to live in fear, as the military’s control over the region tightens.

As international attention grows, the plight of the missing individuals and the broader human rights situation in Balochistan may prompt calls for action from global human rights organizations.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the current status of the missing individuals and the response from Pakistani authorities.

The post Balochistan appeared first on newscri.

“We no longer send dossiers, we go into their homes to kill them,” stated Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, highlighting a concerning shift in tactics regarding the treatment of Sikhs abroad. This remark was made during a conference organized by the Sikh Federation UK, which took place in Geneva on March 17, 2026, amid the 61st session of the United Nations Human Rights Council.

The conference aimed to expose the Modi government’s systematic targeting of Sikh activists and communities living outside India. Leaders from the Sikh diaspora, representing countries such as Canada, the UK, Australia, the US, and Switzerland, gathered to discuss the intensifying transnational repression faced by Sikhs since the 1984 attack on Sri Harmandir Sahib.

Under the leadership of Modi and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, the Indian government has ramped up its surveillance and intimidation tactics against Sikhs abroad. Reports indicate that this repression has included threats and even extrajudicial killings, with intelligence gathering leading to assassinations as recently as 2023.

UN Human Rights Commissioner Volker Türk emphasized the urgent need for “zero tolerance” toward such transnational repression, underscoring the gravity of the situation. The conference served as a crucial platform for raising awareness about the threats facing the Sikh diaspora due to India’s aggressive tactics.

Modi’s earlier statement in April 2024 signaled a shift to more aggressive measures against Sikhs living abroad, further alarming community leaders and human rights advocates. The event in Geneva marked a significant milestone in bringing the plight of Sikhs to a global audience.

Participants at the conference called for the UN to appoint special rapporteurs to document ongoing human rights violations, stressing the need for international oversight in light of India’s actions. The rise of the Khalistan movement has been linked to decades of repression against Sikhs by the Indian government, and the current situation reflects a continuation of this troubling trend.

As the conference concluded, the urgency of addressing the plight of Sikhs abroad was evident, with participants expressing a commitment to continue advocating for their rights on the international stage. The developments in Geneva are expected to influence future discussions at the UN regarding human rights and transnational repression.

The post Ajit Doval’s Role in India’s Transnational Repression of Sikhs appeared first on newscri.

The US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has recommended sanctions against the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and India’s Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW) for alleged violations of religious freedom. This recommendation marks a significant acknowledgment of systemic issues regarding religious freedom in India, particularly as USCIRF’s report claims that conditions deteriorated in 2025.

USCIRF urged the US government to designate India as a “Country of Particular Concern” and recommended freezing assets and imposing travel bans on individuals and entities deemed responsible. The commission’s stance is not new; it has previously suggested placing India in the CPC category.

India’s Ministry of External Affairs has categorically rejected USCIRF’s report, describing it as motivated and biased. Randhir Jaiswal, a spokesperson for the ministry, stated, “We categorically reject its motivated and biased characterisation of India,” further criticizing USCIRF for its selective criticism.

The Congress party has echoed these sentiments, asserting that the USCIRF has warned that the RSS poses a threat to people’s religious freedom. They recalled historical context, noting that Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel banned the RSS following the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi in 1948, highlighting ongoing concerns about the organization’s impact on religious tolerance.

Jaiswal also pointed out the need for USCIRF to reflect on incidents of vandalism and attacks on Hindu temples in the United States, suggesting that the commission should address these issues rather than focusing solely on India.

USCIRF is an independent bipartisan federal commission, and while its recommendations do not automatically translate into policy, they significantly influence public understanding and policy discussions regarding religious freedom.

The 2026 report from USCIRF is seen as a new threshold in recognizing the crisis in India concerning religious freedom. Observers note that this recommendation could have lasting implications for US-India relations, particularly in the context of human rights discussions.

As the situation develops, the international community will be watching closely to see how the US government responds to USCIRF’s recommendations and India’s rebuttal. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential actions that may follow this recommendation.

The post Rss: USCIRF Recommends Sanctions Against for Religious Freedom Violations appeared first on newscri.

Malta’s involvement in the Raisina Dialogue 2026 raises important questions about its role in global discussions on maritime industry and human rights. During the event, Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar held bilateral meetings with leaders from various countries, including Malta’s Deputy Prime Minister Ian Borg, emphasizing the importance of collaboration in these sectors.

Key Discussions at the Raisina Dialogue

Jaishankar’s meeting with Ian Borg focused on the maritime industry, a crucial area for Malta, given its strategic location in the Mediterranean Sea. The Raisina Dialogue, themed “Samskara – Assertion, Accommodation, Advancement,” aims to provide a platform for global decision-makers to exchange ideas on geopolitical and economic issues. With around 2,700 participants from 110 countries in attendance, the dialogue serves as a significant venue for discussing pressing global challenges.

Malta’s Progressive Stance on Human Rights

Malta has made headlines in recent years for its progressive stance on human rights, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ issues. In 2016, Malta became the first country in Europe to ban practices aimed at changing sexual orientation. This landmark decision reflects the country’s commitment to human rights and equality, positioning it as a leader in the region.

The Case of Matthew Grech

Amidst these discussions, the case of Matthew Grech, who was acquitted after a three-year legal battle regarding his views on homosexuality and conversion therapy, highlights the ongoing debates surrounding these issues in Malta. Grech’s trial, which began in April 2022, centered on his interview with PMnews Malta, where he expressed his personal beliefs. The judge ultimately ruled that Grech’s comments were a personal expression of faith rather than an endorsement of conversion therapies.

Implications of Grech’s Acquittal

Grech’s statement following his acquittal underscores the complexities of discussing personal beliefs in the context of public discourse. He remarked, “Today’s decision is not just a personal vindication, it is a reaffirmation of a fundamental principle: speaking about one’s lived experience, including the transforming power of Christ, is not a crime.” This case reflects the broader societal tensions regarding freedom of expression and the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals in Malta.

Future Directions for Malta

As Malta continues to engage in international dialogues, its commitment to human rights and maritime industry development will likely shape its future interactions on the global stage. The discussions at the Raisina Dialogue 2026 may pave the way for enhanced partnerships and collaborative efforts in addressing global challenges.

Malta’s participation in the Raisina Dialogue 2026 illustrates its active role in global discussions, particularly concerning maritime industry and human rights. As the country navigates these complex issues, the outcomes of such dialogues will be crucial in determining Malta’s future trajectory in international relations.

The post Malta’s Role in Global Dialogue: Insights from the Raisina Dialogue 2026 appeared first on newscri.