Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) of the United States, recently warned that Russia, China, North Korea, and Pakistan pose significant nuclear threats to the nation. This statement was made during her testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee on March 18, 2026.

Gabbard’s remarks come amid an alarming assessment from the U.S. intelligence community, which indicates that the number of missiles capable of striking the United States is expected to rise to over 16,000 by 2035. Currently, there are approximately 3,000 such missiles, highlighting a growing concern regarding global security.

In her testimony, Gabbard emphasized that North Korea is strengthening its strategic partnerships with both Russia and China, further complicating the geopolitical landscape. She also noted that Iran’s conventional military power projection capabilities have largely been destroyed, but internal tensions within the country are likely to increase as its economy worsens.

Joe Kent, who recently resigned as the head of the National Center for Counterterrorism over the Iran war, stated, “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation.” This statement contrasts with Gabbard’s assertion that the intelligence community assesses increasing internal tensions in Iran.

Gabbard’s warnings reflect her long-standing position as an outspoken critic of regime change wars, a stance that has shaped her political career. She has consistently advocated for a more measured approach to foreign policy.

In light of these developments, Gabbard’s statements have drawn attention to the complex interplay of international relations and the evolving threats faced by the United States. The situation remains fluid, and further assessments are expected as the intelligence community continues to monitor these threats.

As the geopolitical landscape shifts, the implications of Gabbard’s testimony will likely resonate within both political and military circles. The urgency of addressing these threats cannot be understated, especially as the number of missiles capable of striking the U.S. continues to grow.

Official reactions to Gabbard’s testimony have yet to be fully articulated, but the implications of her warnings are clear. The U.S. must remain vigilant in the face of these emerging threats.

The post Tulsi Gabbard Addresses Nuclear Threats as DNI appeared first on newscri.

Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) of the United States, recently testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, highlighting significant nuclear threats posed by Russia, China, North Korea, and Pakistan. This alarming assessment comes as the U.S. intelligence community projects that the number of missiles capable of striking the United States is expected to exceed 16,000 by 2035.

During her testimony, Gabbard noted that the current assessed number of such missiles stands at approximately 3,000. She emphasized the growing capabilities of adversarial nations, particularly pointing out North Korea’s strengthening strategic partnerships with both Russia and China.

In a related development, Joe Kent, who recently resigned as the head of the National Center for Counterterrorism, stated that Iran posed no imminent threat to the United States. However, Gabbard countered this by indicating that Iran’s conventional military power projection capabilities have largely been destroyed, and internal tensions within the country are likely to escalate as its economy deteriorates.

Gabbard’s warnings reflect a broader concern within the intelligence community regarding the increasing missile capabilities of hostile nations. She stated, “the intelligence community assesses that internal tensions are likely to increase as Iran’s economy worsens,” suggesting a potential for instability in the region.

Furthermore, Gabbard referenced President Trump’s previous conclusions about the Iranian regime, stating, “President Trump concluded that the terrorist Islamist regime in Iran posed an imminent threat and he took action based on that conclusion.” This remark underscores the ongoing debate about the nature of threats posed by Iran and its military capabilities.

The backdrop of Gabbard’s testimony is her long-standing political career as an outspoken critic of regime change wars, which has shaped her perspective on U.S. foreign policy and national security. As tensions rise globally, her insights may influence future discussions on how the U.S. should respond to these evolving threats.

As the situation develops, responses from various political figures and analysts are expected, reflecting the complexities of national security in an increasingly volatile world.

The post Tulsi Gabbard Warns of Nuclear Threats to the U.S. appeared first on newscri.

St. Patrick’s Day, celebrated on March 17 each year, is expected to draw significant attention in 2026, particularly in Washington, DC, where various events are planned. This day, which honors Saint Patrick, the patron saint of Ireland, has evolved from its religious roots into a broader celebration of Irish culture and heritage.

In 2026, St. Patrick’s Day falls on a Tuesday, providing an opportunity for many to partake in festivities throughout the week. The day is recognized as a national holiday in Ireland, although it is not a federal holiday in the United States. The first St. Patrick’s Day celebration in America took place in 1600 in St. Augustine, Florida, marking the beginning of a long tradition.

The first known St. Patrick’s Day parade was held on March 17, 1601, and since then, the celebrations have grown significantly. The 264th St. Patrick’s Day Parade in Manhattan is now the oldest and largest in the world, showcasing the enduring popularity of this holiday.

Historically, Irish laws mandated that pubs be closed on St. Patrick’s Day until the 1970s, reflecting the day’s religious significance. However, the Irish government began campaigning for larger celebrations in 1995 to boost tourism, leading to the vibrant festivities seen today.

Saint Patrick, who died on March 17, 461, is credited with bringing Christianity to Ireland. Born in Britain in 387 AD, he was captured by Irish raiders at age 16, later returning to Ireland as a missionary. The tradition of wearing green on St. Patrick’s Day symbolizes Ireland and is said to protect against leprechauns.

As the day approaches, prominent figures such as Taoiseach Micheal Martin are expected to engage with international leaders, emphasizing the importance of the celebrations. Martin remarked, “I’m sure European leaders and the US administration will engage, and hopefully, we can get a landing zone.”

Former President Donald Trump also commented on the significance of the day, stating, “Look, he’s lucky I exist.” This highlights the intersection of cultural celebrations with political discourse.

As preparations continue, the involvement of various political figures, including Joe Kent and Keir Starmer, indicates that St. Patrick’s Day will be more than just a cultural event; it may also serve as a platform for discussions on international law and relations.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding specific events and participation, but the anticipation for St. Patrick’s Day 2026 continues to grow.

The post St patricks day: St. Patrick’s Day Celebrations Set for March 17, 2026 appeared first on newscri.

In a significant development, Joe Kent has resigned as the head of the United States National Counterterrorism Center on March 17, 2026. His resignation comes amid escalating tensions and military actions in the ongoing war between the United States and Iran, which began on February 28, 2026.

Kent, who was appointed to his position by Donald Trump in July 2025, cited his concerns regarding the Trump administration’s handling of the war. He stated, “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran,” highlighting his belief that Iran posed no imminent threat to the United States.

As a former U.S. Army warrant officer and Green Beret with 20 years of military service, Kent has a deep understanding of military operations. He has also served as a paramilitary officer with the CIA after retiring from the Army. His extensive background adds weight to his criticisms of the current military engagement.

Kent’s resignation is particularly poignant given his personal history; he lost his wife in a conflict he described as “manufactured by Israel.” This personal loss has shaped his views on the current war, which he believes serves “no benefit” to the American people. He expressed disappointment over the ongoing military actions, urging a reevaluation of the motivations behind the war.

In his resignation statement, Kent accused high-ranking Israeli officials and American media of deploying a misinformation campaign to justify the war. He stated, “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.” His comments reflect a growing concern among some military and political figures regarding the influence of foreign interests on U.S. military decisions.

Furthermore, Kent drew parallels between the current situation and the Iraq War, asserting, “This was a lie and is the same tactic the Israelis used to draw us into the disastrous Iraq war that cost our nation the lives of thousands of our best men and women.” His remarks resonate with a segment of the public that remains skeptical of U.S. military interventions abroad.

As reactions to Kent’s resignation unfold, it remains to be seen how this will impact the ongoing conflict and the Trump administration’s strategy moving forward. Kent urged Trump to reflect on the war and its implications for the United States, stating, “I pray that you will reflect upon what we are doing in Iran, and who we are doing it for.” His resignation may signal a growing dissent within military and intelligence circles regarding the current approach to foreign conflicts.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the immediate implications of Kent’s departure from the National Counterterrorism Center, but his outspoken criticism highlights the complexities and controversies surrounding U.S. military involvement in Iran.

The post Joe Kent Resigns as Head of National Counterterrorism Center Amid Iran Conflict appeared first on newscri.

Joe Kent has resigned as head of the US National Counterterrorism Center, a significant move amid the ongoing US-Israel war with Iran, which escalated following attacks launched on February 28. Kent’s resignation marks the most high-profile departure from the Trump administration since the conflict began.

In his resignation letter, Kent expressed his belief that Iran posed no imminent threat to the United States, stating, “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.” His departure comes at a time when the human cost of the war has been rising, with 13 US soldiers and at least 1,444 people in Iran reported killed since the conflict began.

Kent, a former Army Ranger and member of the US Special Forces, had completed 11 combat deployments in the Middle East. He referenced the personal impact of the war in his resignation, noting that his wife was killed in what he described as a war “manufactured by Israel.”

His resignation reflects a growing discontent with the current military engagement, as he criticized the misinformation campaign that undermined Trump’s “America First” platform. Kent stated, “I cannot support sending the next generation off to fight and die in a war that serves no benefit to the American people nor justifies the cost of American lives.”

As the conflict continues, Kent’s departure raises questions about the direction of US foreign policy and the influence of external pressures on military decisions. His resignation may resonate with others who share his concerns about the ongoing war and its implications for American lives and resources.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the potential impact of Kent’s resignation on the National Counterterrorism Center’s operations and future strategies in the region. The situation remains fluid as reactions from other officials and military leaders are awaited.

The post Joe Kent Resigns Amid US-Israel War with Iran appeared first on newscri.