“It is appropriate to grant her bail by imposing suitable conditions that would take care of the apprehension of the prosecution,” stated Justice S Rachaiah of the Karnataka High Court, as he granted bail to Sarbanu Khatun, a 25-year-old woman from Nandigram, West Bengal. Khatun had been arrested on January 12 after a video surfaced showing her shouting the slogan ‘Jai Bangla’ during a demolition drive in Anekal Taluk.

The incident occurred amidst a police operation aimed at removing unauthorized houses, which has been a contentious issue in the region. Following her arrest, Khatun faced charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly promoting enmity and endangering sovereignty.

Initially, Khatun’s bail application was rejected by an additional sessions and district judge, prompting her legal team to appeal the decision. Advocate Rashif Nayarmoole argued that Khatun was provoked to shout ‘Jai Bharat Mata Ki Jai’ and that her actions were a response to the circumstances surrounding the demolition drive.

In the court’s ruling, Justice S Rachaiah emphasized the need for conditions that would mitigate the prosecution’s concerns, ultimately allowing Khatun to secure her release. She was directed to execute a personal bond of Rs 1 lakh.

Khatun is a mother of two minor children, which adds a layer of urgency to her situation. The court’s decision has been met with mixed reactions, reflecting the ongoing tensions surrounding issues of identity and nationalism in India.

In a separate cultural context, the film Bhooth Bangla, starring Akshay Kumar and directed by Priyadarshan, is set to release in theatres on April 10, 2026. The film marks a reunion between Kumar and Priyadarshan after 14 years, and is expected to draw significant attention.

Wamiqa Gabbi, a co-star in the film, has been noted for performing high-risk stunts without external support, showcasing her dedication to the project. A source close to the film remarked, “Wamiqa completely trusted Akshay with the sequence and was comfortable performing it without any external support.”

As the legal proceedings for Khatun unfold, the broader implications of her case continue to resonate within the community, highlighting the intersection of law, identity, and cultural expression in contemporary India.

The post Bangla: Bail Granted to Sarbanu Khatun After ‘Jai ‘ Incident appeared first on newscri.

Before the recent rulings, expectations surrounding the Karnataka High Court were varied. In one case, a student challenged the Central Board of Secondary Education’s (CBSE) decision to debar him after being found with a mobile phone during a board exam. The student had arrived 25 minutes late and claimed he was unaware of the phone in his pocket. The board, however, struggled to provide evidence that the mobile had been used during the examination.

In a decisive moment, the Karnataka High Court upheld the CBSE’s debarment decision, emphasizing that the board was not able to demonstrate any wrongdoing on the student’s part regarding the use of the phone. This ruling contrasts sharply with the initial expectation that the student’s appeal might succeed, given the lack of relevant material found on the device.

The implications of this ruling are significant for the student, who now faces the consequences of being barred from the examination process. This decision reinforces the stringent policies of the CBSE regarding examination conduct, potentially impacting future candidates who find themselves in similar situations.

In another case, the Karnataka High Court denied bail to RD Patil, the alleged mastermind behind a series of recruitment examination frauds. Patil was arrested under the Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act (KCOCA) and is accused of supplying electronic devices to candidates to facilitate cheating.

Justice Rajesh Rai K noted that the prosecution had prima facie material showing Patil’s role in a criminal conspiracy to manipulate recruitment examinations. This ruling marks a significant step in the ongoing efforts to combat examination fraud, contrasting with earlier perceptions that Patil might secure bail after spending two years in custody.

Patil’s case is particularly notable, as he is linked to 25 criminal cases associated with recruitment examination frauds, including eight cases related to FDA and SDA examinations. The court’s decision to deny bail underscores the seriousness of the allegations against him and the judicial system’s commitment to addressing such issues.

In a separate incident, Karnataka High Court judge G. Basavaraj sustained minor injuries in a convoy accident. The accident occurred when a truck unexpectedly turned left, colliding with the escort vehicle. Fortunately, all injured parties were quickly transported to a nearby hospital and are reported to be out of danger.

These developments highlight the active role of the Karnataka High Court in addressing both educational integrity and judicial safety, reflecting a broader commitment to uphold the law in various contexts.

The post High court of karnataka appeared first on newscri.

In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court upheld the decision of the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to cancel a Class 12 student’s exams due to the possession of a mobile phone in the examination hall. This decision contrasts sharply with an earlier judgment by a single judge, who had quashed the penalty and directed the CBSE to announce the student’s results.

Details of the Incident

The incident occurred during the Physical Education exam in February 2025, when the student was found with a mobile phone. The CBSE subsequently disqualified the student for two academic years, categorizing the offense under unfair means, specifically category-3, which addresses serious violations.

Judicial Review

The ruling was delivered by a division bench comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha. They emphasized that the penalty had been ratified by a committee of experts and could not be substituted by the court’s opinion. The court also highlighted the risks associated with mobile phone possession, particularly the potential for question paper leakage.

Implications for the Student

Despite being found with the mobile phone, the student was allowed to complete the exam. However, the ruling now means that the student faces a two-year disqualification from taking further exams, a significant setback considering the student had previously scored 92% in the Class 10 CBSE exams.

Expert Opinions

The court’s decision reflects a broader trend in educational institutions to enforce strict regulations regarding exam conduct. The CBSE’s guidelines classify mere possession of a mobile phone as a serious offense, underscoring the importance of maintaining the integrity of the examination process.

This ruling by the Karnataka High Court sets a precedent for how similar cases may be handled in the future, reinforcing the stance that strict adherence to examination protocols is essential in safeguarding educational standards.

The post High court of karnataka appeared first on newscri.