What does the recent consolidation of power by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in Iran signify for the country’s political landscape? The IRGC has effectively assumed control amid a power struggle with President Masoud Pezeshkian, who has been pushed into a “complete political deadlock.” This shift has raised concerns about the future of governance in Iran.

Since being named Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei has not been seen or heard from, leading to speculation about his health. The IRGC has now taken control of key state functions, with a military council composed of senior IRGC officers making daily decisions. This council has also blocked presidential appointments, further sidelining Pezeshkian.

Ahmad Vahidi, a prominent IRGC figure, has insisted that all vital leadership positions should be managed by the IRGC, reinforcing the military’s grip on power. The IRGC has established a strict security cordon around Mojtaba Khamenei, indicating a heightened level of control and secrecy surrounding the leadership.

The IRGC has been accused of escalating tensions in the region, particularly through its actions against neighboring Gulf countries. In a recent move, the IRGC labeled 18 US companies as “terrorist” and warned their employees to leave their workplaces immediately to save their lives. This warning underscores the IRGC’s aggressive stance in international relations.

Operating independently of the regular army, the IRGC has developed a robust business empire that finances the regime, further entrenching its power within Iran. The organization has emerged as a “state-within-a-state,” combining military might, an intelligence network, and economic power.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the current health status of Mojtaba Khamenei; reports suggest he may be in a coma or critical condition. The long-term implications of the IRGC’s consolidation of power in Iran remain uncertain, raising questions about the future direction of the country.

Pezeshkian has expressed frustration with the IRGC’s approach, particularly its strategy of escalating tensions in the region. He has been vocal about the need for a more diplomatic approach, but the IRGC’s influence appears to be overriding his efforts.

As the situation continues to evolve, the balance of power in Iran may shift further, with the IRGC solidifying its role as a dominant force in both domestic and foreign policy.

The post IRGC Assumes Control Amid Political Deadlock in Iran appeared first on newscri.

On March 11, 2026, the conflict known as the Iran-Israel-US war continues to escalate, following its initiation on February 28, 2026, after the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader and several high-ranking officials. Iran has outlined three specific conditions for ending the war: recognition of its rights, compensation for war damages, and guarantees against future attacks.

Immediate Circumstances

As of today, it has been 12 days since the war began, and the situation remains dire. Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian emphasized that military pressure alone will not resolve the conflict, indicating a need for diplomatic engagement. The ongoing hostilities have resulted in significant civilian casualties and widespread destruction of infrastructure within Iran, exacerbating the already worsening economic conditions due to international sanctions.

The conflict has not only heightened tensions in the Middle East but has also impacted global shipping routes and energy markets, with Brent crude prices reaching $100 per barrel as a direct consequence of the ongoing war. Iranian military officials have issued stern warnings, stating that any attack on its ports could trigger a broader regional response. This assertion underscores the potential for the conflict to escalate further, drawing in neighboring countries and international powers.

Official Statements

In a recent statement, President Pezeshkian remarked, “The only way to end this war — ignited by the Zionist regime and U.S. — is recognising Iran’s legitimate rights, payment of reparations, and firm international guarantees against future aggression.” This statement reflects Iran’s stance on the necessity of addressing the damages caused by the conflict before any peace negotiations can take place.

Additionally, Iranian military spokesperson Abolfazl Shekarchi warned, “If our ports and docks are threatened, all ports and docks in the region will be our legitimate targets.” This declaration highlights the seriousness with which Iran views any potential attacks on its maritime infrastructure, suggesting a readiness to retaliate against perceived aggressors.

Israeli officials, on the other hand, remain skeptical about the effectiveness of military actions in leading to the collapse of Iran’s political system, despite the ongoing military pressure. They believe that the conflict may not achieve its intended goals and could instead entrench Iran’s resolve.

Reactions and Future Implications

The international community is closely monitoring the situation, with concerns about the humanitarian impact of the conflict and the potential for a wider regional war. Iranian officials, including Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf, have stated, “The aggressor must be punished and taught a lesson that will deter them from attacking Iran again,” indicating a firm stance against perceived threats.

As the situation develops, the possibility of diplomatic resolutions remains uncertain. Iran has reiterated its openness to peace but insists that its conditions must be met to ensure a lasting resolution. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential negotiations or international mediation efforts that may arise in the coming days.

The post Iran israel us war live appeared first on newscri.

In a significant development regarding the ongoing conflict, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian announced that Iran has set three specific conditions for ending the war with Israel. These conditions include the recognition of Iran’s rights, payment of reparations for damages incurred during the conflict, and guarantees against future aggression from both Washington and Tel Aviv.

Immediate Circumstances

The war has led to heavy casualties and widespread disruption across the region, exacerbating an already fragile situation. Iranian leadership has made it clear that a ceasefire will only be feasible if these political and security demands are met. The first condition emphasizes the recognition of Iran’s legitimate rights, a point that Pezeshkian has stressed as crucial for any resolution.

The conflict has not only intensified tensions between Iran and Israel but has also drawn in the United States, complicating the geopolitical landscape. Israeli officials have expressed skepticism, suggesting that the war may not necessarily lead to the collapse of Iran’s political system. However, the ongoing hostilities are severely impacting Iran’s economy, with airstrikes and missile attacks damaging critical infrastructure.

Economic Impact on Iran

The Iranian population is facing rising inflation, job losses, and shortages of essential goods as a direct result of the conflict. The economic strain is further compounded by the war’s impact on trade and local markets, leading to widespread discontent among the populace. Iran’s leadership is now calling for the international community to play a role in ensuring regional stability and addressing the humanitarian crisis that has emerged.

Warnings from Iran

Iran has issued warnings that any attack on its ports could provoke a wider regional response, indicating the potential for escalation in the conflict. This stance underscores the precarious nature of the situation, as both sides remain entrenched in their positions. The Iranian government is adamant that its demands must be met to prevent further hostilities.

International Reactions

As the situation develops, international reactions are beginning to surface. The United States and its allies are closely monitoring the conflict, weighing their options in response to Iran’s demands. The complexities of the geopolitical landscape make it clear that any resolution will require careful negotiation and a willingness to address the underlying issues fueling the conflict.

As the war continues, the conditions set by Iran for a ceasefire highlight the challenges ahead for all parties involved. The path to peace remains fraught with difficulties, and details regarding the acceptance of these conditions remain unconfirmed. The international community’s role will be crucial in navigating this complex situation and working towards a sustainable resolution.

The post Israel Iran War Condition: Iran Sets Terms for Ceasefire appeared first on newscri.

The war between Iran and the United States has been ongoing for 13 days, with Iran continuing its attacks throughout the Middle East. The conflict has escalated significantly, leading to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which has caused oil prices to soar.

In a bid to resolve the situation, Russia and Pakistan are attempting to mediate with Iran. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has set three conditions that he claims are necessary to stop the war. He stated, “The only way to end this war—ignited by the Zionist regime & US—is recognizing Iran’s legitimate rights, payment of reparations, and firm int’l guarantees against future aggression.”

Pezeshkian’s remarks underline Iran’s firm stance in the ongoing conflict, emphasizing the need for international recognition of its rights. He also reaffirmed Iran’s commitment to regional peace, despite the ongoing hostilities.

The situation remains tense, with observers closely monitoring the developments. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has raised concerns about global oil supply, given that a significant portion of the world’s oil passes through this critical waterway.

As the conflict continues, the international community is watching to see if Russia and Pakistan’s mediation efforts will yield any results. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the specific nature of the negotiations and whether they will lead to a ceasefire.

The implications of this conflict extend beyond the immediate region, affecting global markets and geopolitical relations. The ongoing war has already had significant repercussions, particularly in the energy sector.

With the situation evolving rapidly, the coming days will be crucial in determining the future of the conflict and the potential for a diplomatic resolution.

The post रूस mediates in Iran conflict as war with the US continues appeared first on newscri.

The war between Iran and Israel, which began on February 28, 2026, has resulted in at least 13 deaths and nearly 2,000 injuries in Israel, while Iranian officials report 1,395 fatalities in Iran. The conflict has caused extensive damage, with nearly 20,000 civilian buildings affected, including at least 16,000 residential units.

Iran’s Conditions for Peace

Iran has set three conditions for ending the war: recognition of its rights, payment of reparations, and guarantees against future aggression. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian emphasized that Tehran remains committed to peace but insists the conflict can end only if its demands are accepted by Washington and Tel Aviv.

Military Actions and Casualties

Iran’s military has targeted Israeli military bases and the Shin Bet headquarters, contributing to the ongoing violence. The conflict has also led to significant civilian casualties, including a tragic incident in Minab where at least 168 people, including children, were killed when a primary school was struck by a munition identified as a US Tomahawk missile.

Health and Infrastructure Impact

In addition to the loss of life, the war has severely impacted health facilities in Iran. Iranian Deputy Health Minister Ali Jafarian reported damage to hospitals and health facilities due to US-Israeli strikes. He noted serious concerns regarding public health, particularly in cities like Karaj, where electricity shortages have been reported.

Warnings from Iranian Officials

Iranian parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf warned that any US aggression against Iranian islands will prompt Tehran to abandon all restraint. This statement underscores the heightened tensions and the potential for further escalation in the region.

As the conflict continues, observers are closely monitoring the situation for any developments regarding peace negotiations or further military actions. Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full extent of the damage and casualties as both sides continue to engage in hostilities.

The post War iran israel: The Ongoing War Between Iran and Israel: Key Developments appeared first on newscri.

On March 8, 2026, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian publicly apologized to neighboring countries for recent military strikes that have heightened tensions in the region. This statement comes in the wake of escalating conflict involving airstrikes and drone attacks, which have resulted in significant casualties and damage.

Pezeshkian emphasized that Iran has no intention of invading other countries, stating, “I apologise to the neighbouring countries. We have no intention of invading other countries.” His remarks suggest a potential shift towards a more diplomatic approach in dealing with regional relations, as he indicated that neighboring countries would not be targeted unless provoked.

However, the apology has not been universally welcomed. Iran’s judiciary chief, Mohseni-Ejei, criticized Pezeshkian’s stance, asserting that retaliatory strikes would continue. This reflects the ongoing internal divisions within the Iranian leadership, particularly following the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which has left the leadership council in turmoil.

In a related statement, Iran’s Parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, pointed to the presence of US military bases in the region as a significant barrier to peace, declaring, “As long as the presence of US bases in the region continue, the countries will not enjoy peace.” This highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics at play, as tensions between Iran and the United States continue to influence regional stability.

The recent conflict has seen significant casualties, with Iran’s UN ambassador reporting that 1,332 Iranian civilians have been killed in US-Israeli air strikes. Additionally, US Central Command has confirmed that thousands of strikes have been conducted on targets inside Iran, with Operation Epic Fury resulting in approximately 3,000 targets struck. The Iranian Revolutionary Guards have also claimed responsibility for drone strikes targeting a US air combat center at Al Dhafra Air Base.

Pezeshkian’s original statement was partially amended following backlash from hardliners within the government, indicating the delicate balance he must maintain in addressing both domestic and international pressures. He also dismissed former President Donald Trump’s demand for Iran’s unconditional surrender as “a dream that they should take to their grave,” further illustrating the contentious nature of US-Iran relations.

As the situation continues to unfold, the Iranian leadership faces the challenge of navigating internal dissent while addressing the broader implications of their military actions. The conflict, which has now been ongoing for eight days, raises questions about the future of diplomacy in the region and the potential for further escalation.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full scope of the military conflict and its impact on regional stability. The Iranian government’s response to both external pressures and internal criticisms will be crucial in determining the path forward in this volatile situation.

The post Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian Issues Apology Amid Regional Tensions appeared first on newscri.