As the 2026 Indian Premier League (IPL) season approaches, the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) confirmed that Yash Dayal will not be joining their squad. This decision comes in light of serious legal allegations against the player, including sexual assault and exploitation, which have been under investigation since July last year.

On a recent date, RCB’s director of cricket, Mo Bobat, stated, “Yash will not be joining the squad as he is going through a personal situation.” This statement underscores the gravity of Dayal’s circumstances, which have prevented him from participating in the entire domestic season for Uttar Pradesh.

The legal troubles for Dayal have escalated, with a POCSO case currently being investigated in Jaipur. The Rajasthan High Court has denied him interim relief, further complicating his situation. Bobat acknowledged the challenges Dayal is facing, noting, “Yash’s situation has been tricky.”

Despite these difficulties, RCB has maintained communication with Dayal, offering support during this turbulent time. Bobat emphasized, “We’ve been very supportive of Yash to date and that’s reflected in the opportunity to either retain or release players.” This indicates that the franchise is considering its options while remaining empathetic towards Dayal’s plight.

As of now, the situation remains fluid, with Dayal’s absence from the IPL 2026 season confirmed. The ongoing legal issues have overshadowed his cricketing career, raising concerns about his future in the sport.

The implications of these events are significant for Dayal, who has been grappling with legal challenges for over a year. His absence from the IPL not only affects his career but also reflects the broader issues of accountability and support within professional sports.

In summary, Yash Dayal’s situation is a stark reminder of the complexities athletes may face off the field. As the IPL season unfolds, the focus will remain on how RCB navigates this challenging scenario while supporting their player.

The post Yash Dayal’s Absence from IPL 2026 appeared first on newscri.

The Rajasthan High Court has made a significant ruling that prohibits universities from imposing additional processing charges for providing certified copies of answer sheets under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. This decision directly impacts the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS), which had previously demanded a processing fee of ₹1000 per application.

The case, identified as D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13783/2021, was brought forth by Vipika, a B.Sc. Nursing student. Vipika sought certified copies of her evaluated answer books but faced a total demand of ₹1225 for each answer book, which included the ₹1000 processing fee. The Court’s ruling emphasized that such charges are contrary to the provisions of the RTI Act.

The Court highlighted that public authorities must adhere to the fee structure prescribed under the RTI Act, which allows for a nominal application fee of ₹10 and a cost of ₹2 per page for copies of documents. In this instance, the total photocopy charges for the 40 pages of an answer book would amount to ₹80, plus ₹145 for postal charges, significantly less than the amount demanded by RUHS.

In delivering its judgment, the Rajasthan High Court referred to several Supreme Court decisions that recognize the right of examinees to access their evaluated answer sheets under the RTI Act. The Court noted that imposing a processing fee of ₹1000 serves to discourage students from seeking access to their academic evaluations.

The ruling quashed the guidelines set by RUHS that mandated this processing fee, reinforcing the principle that public authorities cannot impose additional charges inconsistent with the RTI rules. The Court stated, “The fee payable for seeking information under the Act is already specified by the statutory rules and public authorities cannot prescribe additional charges that are inconsistent with those rules.”

Furthermore, the Court emphasized the overriding effect of the RTI Act, as stated in Section 22, which ensures that it takes precedence over any other law or regulation. This ruling is expected to have a broader impact on how public universities across India handle RTI requests, particularly regarding the accessibility of evaluated answer sheets.

As of now, the implications of this ruling are being observed closely, especially by other educational institutions that may have similar fee structures in place. The decision is likely to encourage more students to exercise their rights under the RTI Act without the burden of excessive fees.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any immediate changes to RUHS’s policies following this ruling, but it is anticipated that the university will need to comply with the Court’s directives to avoid further legal challenges.

The post Ruhs: Rajasthan High Court Ruling on Processing Fees appeared first on newscri.

The Rajasthan High Court has made a significant ruling that prohibits universities, including the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS), from imposing additional processing charges for providing certified copies of answer sheets under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. This decision underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in educational institutions.

The ruling came after a petition was filed by Vipika, a B.Sc. Nursing student, who sought certified copies of her evaluated answer books. The university had demanded a total of ₹1225 for each answer book, which included a ₹1000 processing fee deemed illegal by the court.

Justice Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, who presided over the case, emphasized that the fee structure prescribed under the RTI Act must be adhered to by public authorities. The court found that the imposition of a ₹1000 processing fee appeared to be an attempt to discourage students from seeking access to their evaluated answer sheets.

The court quashed the university’s guidelines that mandated the ₹1000 fee and directed RUHS to charge only the fees specified under the RTI Rules. According to the RTI Act, the application fee is set at ₹10, with additional charges of ₹2 per page for copies of documents.

In this case, the average answer book contained approximately 40 pages, leading to photocopy charges calculated at ₹80, along with ₹145 for postal charges. The total amount demanded by the university was significantly higher than what is legally permissible.

The court’s decision aligns with several Supreme Court rulings that recognize the right of examinees to access their evaluated answer sheets under the RTI Act. This ruling is expected to have a far-reaching impact on how universities handle RTI requests, promoting greater transparency.

The RTI Act aims to foster transparency and accountability in public authorities, ensuring that students and citizens can access information without undue financial burdens. The court’s ruling reinforces the notion that public authorities cannot impose additional charges that conflict with statutory rules.

As this ruling sets a precedent, it remains to be seen how RUHS and other universities will adjust their policies in compliance with the court’s directives. Further developments in this area are anticipated as educational institutions respond to the ruling.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding any immediate changes that RUHS might implement in light of this decision.

The post Ruhs: Rajasthan High Court Ruling on Processing Fees appeared first on newscri.