Sunrisers Leeds, owned by Sun TV, an Indian company, signed the Pakistani cricketer for USD 255,000. This decision has not only stirred up a significant backlash on social media but has also drawn sharp criticism from notable figures such as former Indian cricketer Sunil Gavaskar. In a column for Mid-day, Gavaskar expressed his concerns regarding the ramifications of employing a Pakistani player, stating that the fees paid to such players indirectly contribute to the deaths of Indian soldiers and civilians.

Gavaskar’s comments highlight the sensitive nature of the relationship between India and Pakistan, especially in the realm of sports. He noted, “The furore created by the acquisition of a Pakistani player by the Indian owner of a franchise in The Hundred is hardly surprising.” This sentiment reflects the broader public sentiment, as many Indian fans have taken to social media to voice their disapproval of the signing.

Furthermore, Gavaskar warned that the backlash could escalate to boycotts by Indian fans against Sunrisers Leeds, stating, “It won’t be a surprise that for every game that this team plays, whether at home or away, there will be massive demonstrations by Indian fans protesting at this hard-to-believe buying.” His remarks underscore the potential for significant public outcry surrounding the franchise’s decision.

Rajeev Shukla, a prominent figure in Indian cricket administration, weighed in on the controversy, asserting that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has no authority over leagues outside the IPL. This statement indicates the complexities of governance in cricket and how international relations can influence sports management.

What the data shows

The financial implications of the signing are notable, with the contract amounting to approximately 190,000 GBP or 2.3 crore INR. This figure reflects the growing market for cricket talent, even as political tensions loom over such decisions. The year 2008, marked by the Mumbai terror attacks, remains a pivotal point in the history of cricket relations between India and Pakistan, leading to the ongoing exclusion of Pakistani players from the IPL.

As the situation unfolds, the future of Abrar Ahmed’s tenure with Sunrisers Leeds remains uncertain. With the potential for protests and public backlash, the franchise may need to navigate a complex landscape of fan sentiment and political implications. Details remain unconfirmed regarding how the franchise plans to address the concerns raised by fans and cricketing authorities.

In summary, the signing of Abrar Ahmed by Sunrisers Leeds not only highlights the intersection of sports and politics but also raises questions about the future of Pakistani players in leagues owned by Indian entities. As the cricketing world watches closely, the implications of this signing could resonate far beyond the boundaries of the cricket field.

The post Abrar Ahmed Sunrisers Leeds Signing Controversy appeared first on newscri.

During the awards ceremony, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) mistakenly credited Shubman Gill as the captain of the Indian team for the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy. This error was particularly striking given that Rohit Sharma was the actual captain during the tournament. The oversight occurred while celebrating a historic year for Indian cricket, which included honoring five recent ICC trophy-winning squads.

Shubman Gill was recognized as the Best International Cricketer at the BCCI Naman Awards 2026, a title that reflects his significant contributions to the team. However, the error regarding his captaincy status has triggered a backlash from fans of Rohit Sharma, who took to social media to express their discontent. The hashtag #DontRewriteHistory began trending, highlighting the frustration among supporters who felt that the BCCI was misrepresenting the facts.

Fans voiced their opinions through various platforms, with comments such as, “Ye kya Bhai bcci walo kuch to Sharam kar liya Karo gill kab captain tha champion trophy mein winning captain dikha raho champion trophy ka .. wo bol aisa rha hai jaise wahi captain tha…” from Sudhanshu Rao Chandel Rajput, and others questioning the integrity of the BCCI’s portrayal of events. Atharva Pulujkar remarked, “This fraud was not the winning captain,” while RK added, “How can you mention him as winning captain? Rohit was captain right?”

The BCCI has yet to issue an official apology for the error, which has only intensified the scrutiny surrounding the incident. Observers noted that the graphic mistake was edited out of the delayed broadcast, indicating an awareness of the potential backlash. The situation has raised questions about the accuracy of historical records in sports and the responsibilities of governing bodies in representing their athletes.

As the controversy unfolds, it remains to be seen how the BCCI will address the situation moving forward. The incident has sparked discussions about the importance of accurate representation in sports history and the potential consequences of miscommunication. Fans and analysts alike are watching closely to see if the BCCI will take steps to rectify the situation or if the backlash will continue to grow.

In the meantime, Shubman Gill, who served as the vice-captain of the Indian ODI team during the Champions Trophy, continues to receive accolades for his performance. However, the shadow of this error looms large, reminding everyone of the complexities involved in sports narratives and the significance of acknowledging the true leaders of a team.

The post Shubman Gill Champions Trophy Error Sparks Controversy appeared first on newscri.