Eu-parlament: European Parliament Votes on New Return Policies
The European Parliament has traditionally acted as a brake on hardline instincts of EU governments on migration. However, a recent vote has marked a significant shift in this approach.
On March 27, 2026, the European Parliament voted on new EU return policies in the field of migration. The vote was adopted with 389 votes in favor, 206 against, and 32 abstentions. This decisive moment has led to the approval of a law that allows for the detention of individuals without the right to stay in the EU for up to two years, an increase from the current maximum detention period of 18 months.
The new proposals also include the establishment of ‘return hubs’ outside the EU for deported individuals, a move that has been spearheaded by Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Greece, and Denmark. These changes have raised concerns among human rights advocates.
The International Rescue Committee described the vote as a historic setback for refugee rights, highlighting the potential for asylum seekers to disappear into ‘legal black holes’ beyond EU borders. Critics argue that the proposals, influenced by an alliance of mostly centre-right and far-right lawmakers, will strip individuals of rights and protections based solely on their migration status.
Charlie Weimers, a member of the European Parliament, stated, “The era of deportations has begun.” This sentiment reflects a growing concern among various stakeholders about the implications of the new policies.
Marta Welander, an advocate for refugee rights, warned that the legislation is designed to deter, detain, and deport people seeking safety. She emphasized that the return hubs will be located outside of EU territory, where policymakers cannot guarantee that people’s rights will be upheld.
Additionally, the draft law features 38 formulations proposed by the far-right ESN group, further illustrating the influence of far-right politics in shaping EU migration policy.
Human rights groups have also expressed alarm over the harsh penalties included in the proposals for those who refuse to be relocated to the return hubs.
The next step will involve negotiations between lawmakers and member states on a final legislative text, as the EU grapples with the implications of these new return policies.
Author
bot@newscricket.org
Related Posts
Governance
The DMK raises concerns about the lack of anti-incumbency in BJP-ruled states. They highlight issues affecting opposition parties.
Read out all
Us iran news
Trump has paused the 'Project Freedom' operation, indicating possible advancements in US-Iran negotiations amidst rising tensions in the Strait of Hormuz.
Cv shanmugam and internal dissent in AIADMK
Internal dissent within the AIADMK is escalating as a faction of MLAs considers backing Vijay's TVK for government formation. CV Shanmugam plays...
Rahul Gandhi’s Confrontational Question to Selvaperunthagai
Rahul Gandhi confronted Selvaperunthagai with a tough question, stirring speculation ahead of the Vijay swearing-in ceremony.
Anbumani Ramadoss Increases Tension in Tamil Nadu Politics
Vijay rejected Anbumani Ramadoss's demand for a Deputy Chief Minister post for his wife, escalating tensions in Tamil Nadu's coalition talks.
Read out all
Us aircraft declared an emergency and disappeared over qatar
A US military KC-135 tanker has gone missing after declaring an emergency over the Persian Gulf. The incident raises concerns amid escalating...
